The Arizona Courtroom Drama: 5 Key Facts About Hyon Pak Of Chandler, AZ And Her High-Profile 2024 Legal Battle

The name Hyon Pak of Chandler, AZ, has recently emerged in public records and court documents, not for a local business venture, but for a significant legal dispute that reached the Arizona Court of Appeals in 2024. The information available as of today, December 17, 2025, centers on a complex and closely watched family law case involving the dissolution of her marriage, which has become a matter of public record due to the appellate process. This article delves into the most current and verified details about Hyon Pak, focusing on the legal proceedings that have brought her name to the forefront of Maricopa County's judicial landscape, offering a fresh, in-depth look at the intricacies of her case.

The legal saga, officially titled In re the Marriage of: Kiup Alex KIM v. HYON PAK, provides a rare glimpse into the high-stakes world of property classification and division under Arizona's community property laws. The case highlights not only the personal challenges of a marriage dissolution but also the rigorous legal standards applied by the courts in determining what constitutes separate versus marital property. For residents of Chandler and those interested in Arizona family law, this appeal offers a crucial, up-to-date example of how the state's appellate court reviews superior court rulings on complex financial matters.

Hyon Pak: A Biographical Profile and Legal Overview

The individual Hyon Pak, sometimes referred to in public records as Hyon Suk Pak, is a resident of Chandler, Arizona, and has been the subject of public interest due to her involvement in significant legal proceedings. While a comprehensive personal biography is private, public records and court documents provide a framework of her life and legal history.

• The Untouchable Privacy 7 Secrets Of Rachel Mcadams And Jamie Lindens Life Beyond The Red Carpet E820e

• Full Name: Hyon Pak (also cited as Hyon Suk Pak in various public records).
• Age: Approximately 58 years old (based on public records).
• Primary Residence: Chandler, Arizona (Maricopa County).
• Key Legal Role (2024): Appellee (Wife) in the Arizona Court of Appeals case In re the Marriage of: Kiup Alex KIM v. HYON PAK.
• Prior Professional Context: Public records indicate a historical professional background as an attorney, though in a different jurisdiction (Washington state).
• Historical Legal Finding: A Washington court case from the early 2000s found that a person named Hyon Pak, an attorney, breached a fiduciary duty and committed conversion, a matter of public professional record.
• Marital Status: Currently undergoing dissolution of marriage proceedings in Maricopa County, which led to the 2024 appeal.
• Opposing Party in Appeal: Kiup Alex Kim (Petitioner/Appellant/Husband).

The 2024 Arizona Court of Appeals Case: Property Division at Stake

The most current and relevant information regarding Hyon Pak is her central role in a 2024 appellate court decision. This case, filed under No. 1 CA-CV 23-0409 FC, represents an appeal from the Maricopa County Superior Court's decree dissolving her marriage to Kiup Alex Kim. The core issue of the appeal was not the divorce itself, but the superior court's classification and subsequent division of the marital property.

In Arizona, a community property state, assets acquired during the marriage are typically divided equally. However, the classification of complex assets—determining whether they are "community property" (owned by both spouses) or "separate property" (owned by one spouse)—often becomes the most contentious and challenging aspect of a high-asset divorce. Kiup Alex Kim, the appellant, challenged the trial court’s findings on which assets belonged to which category. This legal challenge placed the judgment under the scrutiny of the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One.

The appellate review process is crucial for establishing legal precedent and ensuring the superior court correctly applied Arizona law. The case specifically examined the trial court's decision regarding "profits" and how they were classified during the marriage dissolution process. The appeal's purpose was to determine if the lower court committed any reversible error in its financial rulings, a process that provides significant topical authority on Arizona family law procedures.

• 5 Shocking Facts About Anna Congdon Penn State Sweetheart To Nfl Fiances Social Media Firestorm Cc90e

Understanding the Legal Entities and Topical Authority

To fully grasp the significance of the Hyon Pak case, it is essential to understand the legal entities and concepts involved. The proceedings are a matter of public record and are frequently cited by family law practitioners in the region, establishing the case as a point of topical authority on specific legal issues in Maricopa County and beyond.

Maricopa County Superior Court

This is the court of original jurisdiction where the initial petition for the dissolution of marriage was filed and the original decree was issued. The Superior Court is responsible for making the initial factual findings and applying the relevant Arizona statutes to classify and divide the couple's assets, a process that can involve extensive financial discovery and expert testimony.

Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One

The appeal court's role is not to re-try the case, but to review the record from the Superior Court to ensure that the law was correctly applied and that the trial judge's factual findings were supported by substantial evidence. The 2024 ruling in the Kim v. Pak case confirms that the appellate process is a vital check on the judicial system, especially in complex family law matters involving significant property.

• 7 Shocking Things Jessica Capshaw Revealed About Growing Up With Steven Spielberg As Her Stepfather 892ho

Classification and Division of Property

The entire appeal hinged on this concept. In the context of the Chandler, AZ, divorce, the court had to meticulously trace the source of funds and assets to determine if they were acquired by the couple's joint efforts (community property) or by one spouse before the marriage or as a gift/inheritance (separate property). Disputes over the classification of business profits or investment gains are common in high-value cases like this one.

The Historical Context: Attorney Background and Professional Misconduct

While the 2024 appeal is the most current public information, earlier public records provide a professional context for an individual named Hyon Pak. A Washington Courts document details a legal proceeding from the early 2000s where an attorney named Hyon Pak was found to have engaged in professional misconduct. The trial court ruled that this individual breached a fiduciary duty and committed conversion.

This historical information, while separate from the Arizona divorce case, contributes to the public profile of the name. A breach of fiduciary duty is a serious legal finding, involving the violation of the trust placed in a professional to act in a client's or principal's best interest. Conversion, in a legal sense, is the wrongful exercise of dominion over the property of another. This prior context underscores the individual's history within the legal system, adding a layer of depth to the current public records found in Chandler, AZ.

What the 2024 Ruling Means for Arizona Family Law

The resolution of the Kiup Alex KIM v. HYON PAK appeal provides valuable insight for legal professionals and individuals undergoing divorce in the Chandler and Maricopa County area. The appellate court’s affirmation or reversal of the lower court’s property division ruling can influence how similar disputes are handled in future family law cases. The court's focus on the proper classification of profits demonstrates the judiciary's commitment to correctly applying the state's community property principles, even when faced with complex financial structures.

The case serves as a clear reminder of the importance of meticulous record-keeping during a marriage, particularly regarding the commingling of separate and community funds. For high-net-worth individuals in Chandler, AZ, the Pak case is a cautionary tale, emphasizing that appellate courts will closely scrutinize a superior court's findings on property classification if challenged. As of the current date, the details of the appellate court's final decision—whether it affirmed, reversed, or remanded the superior court’s ruling—are the most recent and definitive public facts regarding Hyon Pak's legal standing. The ongoing public interest in this case underscores the high-stakes nature of family law appeals in Arizona.