The 9/11 Files: 5 Shocking Claims Tucker Carlson Is Pushing About The Official Narrative

The landscape of public discourse surrounding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks has been dramatically reshaped, as of late December 2025, by the explosive documentary series from conservative commentator Tucker Carlson. The former Fox News host, now operating on his own independent platform, has released a multi-part investigation titled The 9/11 Files, which explicitly challenges the decades-old official narrative. This move marks a significant pivot for Carlson, who was once a vocal critic of the "truther" movement, but now positions himself as a leading voice questioning the established account of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The series has immediately sparked intense debate, drawing both fervent support from skeptics and fierce condemnation from critics who accuse him of promoting dangerous conspiracy theories.

The core intention of The 9/11 Files is to scrutinize the government's handling of the events leading up to and following 9/11, suggesting that key details were deliberately obscured or covered up by powerful agencies. Carlson’s shift from mainstream media to an independent documentary format has allowed him to delve into topics considered highly controversial, focusing particularly on the roles of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the effectiveness of the subsequent 9/11 Commission. This deep dive into one of America's most tragic days has reignited a complex national conversation about accountability, intelligence failures, and the integrity of the official investigation.

Tucker Carlson: A Brief Biography and Career Profile

Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson is an American conservative political commentator, writer, and television host known for his influential role in contemporary media. His career has spanned print journalism, cable news, and, most recently, independent digital media.

• The Untouchable Privacy 7 Secrets Of Rachel Mcadams And Jamie Lindens Life Beyond The Red Carpet E820e

• Full Name: Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson
• Born: May 16, 1969
• Birthplace: San Francisco, California, U.S.
• Education: St. George's School; Trinity College (B.A. in History)
• Family: Son of Richard Warner Carlson (former U.S. Ambassador to the Seychelles and head of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting) and Lisa McNear Lombardi.
• Wife: Susan Andrews Carlson (married 1991)
• Career Highlights:
  • Co-founded the website The Daily Caller (2010).
  • Hosted Tucker Carlson Tonight on Fox News (2016–2023), which became one of the highest-rated programs in cable news history.
  • Served as a host on CNN's Crossfire and MSNBC's Tucker.
  • Launched The Tucker Carlson Show on his own platform after his departure from Fox News.
• Political Stance: Generally described as paleoconservative or populist, known for his critiques of globalism, corporate power, and the mainstream media.

The Radical Shift: Why Carlson Now Embraces 9/11 Skepticism

For years, Tucker Carlson was a staunch opponent of the "9/11 truth movement," often mocking its proponents. His pivot to producing a multi-part series that questions the established facts is perhaps the most significant aspect of this controversy. This shift is seen by many analysts as a strategic move to solidify his position with a growing segment of the American population that distrusts government institutions and official narratives.

The documentary, which is being released in episodes on his network, focuses on alleged inconsistencies, suppressed evidence, and the background of the individuals involved in the official investigation. The series attempts to frame the September 11 attacks not just as a failure of intelligence, but as an event where the truth was actively managed and concealed from the American public.

This new stance has drawn fire from former colleagues and political rivals. Critics argue that by lending his considerable platform and credibility to these claims, Carlson is mainstreaming dangerous and unfounded conspiracy theories that undermine national unity and disrespect the victims of the attacks. The debate highlights a deep fissure in American political discourse: the trust—or lack thereof—in government institutions like the CIA, FBI, and the official 9/11 Commission Report.

• The Unseen Story Jessica Simpsons Battle For Privacy And Body Image In A Digital Age Mlvqa

5 Core Claims from Tucker Carlson's 'The 9/11 Files' Docuseries

Carlson's docuseries is structured as an investigation into specific aspects of the 9/11 attacks and their aftermath. Each episode attempts to dismantle a piece of the official narrative, using interviews with former government officials, intelligence experts, and family members of the victims. The following are five of the most controversial and central claims being pushed in the series:

1. The CIA's 'Secret Mission Gone Wrong'

One of the central themes of the series, particularly in the first episode, is an alleged operation by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that went catastrophically awry. The claim suggests that the CIA was not merely incompetent in preventing the attacks, but that their actions or covert activities directly contributed to the success of the Al Qaeda plot.

This line of argument focuses on the intelligence community's foreknowledge of the terrorists' presence in the US and the alleged mishandling of key intelligence. The implication is that a "secret mission" intended to monitor or control the situation somehow spiraled out of control, creating the conditions for the 9/11 tragedy.

• The Chilling True Story 5 Key Facts About Richard Evonitz The Serial Killer Who Kidnapped Kara Robinson Chamberlain Xpjje

2. The 9/11 Commission Was a 'Total Fraud' and 'Cover-up'

Carlson dedicates an entire episode to dissecting the work of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, commonly known as the 9/11 Commission. He asserts that the commission, established by Congress, was a "total fraud from the beginning."

The series claims that the commission was led by individuals who were themselves "responsible for preventing the attack" and therefore had a vested interest in concealing the truth. This argument suggests a deliberate, high-level effort to control the narrative and shield powerful figures in the George W. Bush administration and intelligence agencies from accountability.

3. The Role of Saudi Arabia Was Deliberately Obscured

A significant focus of The 9/11 Files is the long-standing suspicion regarding the involvement of Saudi Arabia. Carlson argues that the US government, due to its complex relationship with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, has actively suppressed evidence of official Saudi support or funding for the 9/11 hijackers.

The documentary highlights the ongoing lawsuits filed by victims' families against the Saudi government, suggesting that recently surfaced evidence points to a level of Saudi complicity that the official report failed to fully address. This claim resonates with those who believe the US government prioritized geopolitical interests over the pursuit of justice for the New York City and Pentagon attacks.

4. Questioning the Official Account of the Pentagon Attack

While the World Trade Center collapse remains the most visually shocking aspect of 9/11, Carlson's series also touches upon the long-debated details surrounding the attack on the Pentagon. Although the official narrative states that American Airlines Flight 77 struck the building, the documentary seeks to amplify existing questions about the physical evidence, the flight path, and the speed of the aircraft.

By scrutinizing witness testimony and the government's refusal to release all relevant evidence, the series attempts to sow doubt in the public's mind about the precise sequence of events at the Pentagon, a common theme in the broader "truther" movement.

5. Suppression of Evidence and Whistleblowers

Throughout the series, Carlson repeatedly suggests that the US government has a history of intimidating and silencing whistleblowers and suppressing evidence that contradicts the official 9/11 Commission Report. The documentary features interviews with individuals who claim to have firsthand knowledge of intelligence failures or cover-ups, presenting them as heroes whose warnings were ignored or whose stories were discredited.

This claim serves as the overarching framework for the entire series, suggesting that the "truth" about 9/11 is not a mystery, but a secret that has been actively protected by the American national security state for over two decades. The promotion of this theory is a direct challenge to the authority and trustworthiness of the US government and its institutions.

Topical Authority and The 9/11 Legacy

The release of The 9/11 Files by Tucker Carlson is not merely a media event; it is a significant cultural and political moment. It has forced a renewed public discussion on a topic many believed was settled history. The documentary taps into a deep vein of anti-establishment sentiment, using the solemn legacy of 9/11 to question the power structures in Washington, D.C.

The key entities and concepts that form the topical authority of this debate include the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the 9/11 Commission Report, Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, the World Trade Center (WTC), the Pentagon, Flight 93, the Bush Administration, Dick Cheney, the Patriot Act, the War on Terror, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Carlson's work deliberately connects these entities to suggest a vast, systemic failure and subsequent cover-up.

Whether one agrees with the claims or views them as irresponsible conspiracy theories, the series has undeniably pushed the conversation about the September 11, 2001, attacks back into the forefront of American political discourse. It serves as a powerful example of how influential media figures, operating outside traditional gatekeepers like Fox News, can leverage public distrust to challenge historical consensus and the official narrative of one of the 21st century's defining events.