Dr. Clare Craig has emerged as one of the most prominent and polarizing figures in the global public health debate since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. As of late 2025, the British consultant pathologist continues to challenge mainstream narratives, focusing her extensive diagnostic experience on dissecting government data, the reliability of testing protocols, and the alarming trends in excess mortality across the UK and other nations. Her work, often shared through her popular Substack and as co-chair of the HART Group, provides a deep, technical, and often controversial perspective that is essential for understanding the full spectrum of post-pandemic analysis.
The information presented here is a fresh, in-depth look at her professional background, her current areas of focus, and the controversial entities she is associated with. It is important to note that the name "Clare Craig" refers to multiple public figures, but this article focuses on the renowned medical expert whose work has sparked significant public and parliamentary debate over the last few years.
Dr. Clare Craig: Complete Professional Biography & The Namesakes
The name Clare Craig is associated with several accomplished women, but the individual central to the global health discourse is the diagnostic pathologist. Her comprehensive profile is as follows:
- Full Name: Dr. Clare Craig, B.M., B.Ch., FRCPath.
- Date of Birth: 13 July 1975.
- Primary Profession: Consultant Pathologist (Diagnostic Pathologist).
- Education: Studied Medicine at the University of Cambridge.
- Career Timeline: Reached Consultant Pathologist level in the NHS (National Health Service) in 2009, with over 20 years of experience in medicine. She also previously worked as the Head of Pathology at Panakeia Technologies Ltd.
- Current Key Affiliations: Co-chair of the HART Group (Health Advisory and Recovery Team); Signatory to the Cape Byron Lighthouse Declaration.
- Public Stance: Key figure in the lockdown-sceptic movement and a vocal critic of the official public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly concerning data analysis and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs).
A Note on Namesakes
To ensure clarity, two other notable public figures share a similar name:
- Clare Craig (Wife of Tommy Fleetwood): A well-known sports manager and charity trustee, married to professional golfer Tommy Fleetwood.
- Dr. Claire Craig (Academic): A former Provost of The Queen's College, Oxford, who specialized in geophysics and has a background in government and consulting.
7 Key Areas of Dr. Clare Craig's Controversial Public Health Analysis
Dr. Craig’s work is characterized by a forensic, data-driven approach, applying her expertise in diagnostics and laboratory processes to large-scale public health data. Her most recent and impactful analyses centre on seven core areas that challenge the prevailing scientific consensus.
1. The Alarming Trend of Excess Mortality
One of the most persistent and urgent topics in Dr. Craig’s current work is the analysis of excess deaths—the number of deaths above the historical average. She has repeatedly called for a formal, transparent investigation into the sustained high levels of non-COVID-19 excess mortality observed in the UK and other Western nations.
Her analysis, often presented to parliamentary groups, suggests that these deaths may be linked to a combination of factors, including the long-term unintended consequences of lockdown policies, delayed diagnosis of serious illnesses like cancer and heart disease, and potential secondary effects from the mass vaccination campaign.
2. Questioning the Reliability of PCR Testing
As a diagnostic pathologist, Dr. Craig's expertise is highly relevant to laboratory testing. She has been a vocal critic of the widespread use of the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) test during the pandemic, particularly the high cycle threshold (Ct) values used in many testing regimes.
She argues that high Ct values lead to a high rate of false positives, detecting non-infectious viral fragments long after a person has recovered or even detecting contamination, thereby artificially inflating case numbers and justifying restrictive NPIs. This critique is a cornerstone of the lockdown-sceptic argument, emphasizing that the "case-demic" was fundamentally flawed.
3. Analysis of Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) Data
Dr. Craig has co-authored a number of papers and reports that analyse data from the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) in the United States, as well as similar systems globally. Her work focuses on identifying and analyzing reported deaths and serious injuries temporally associated with the COVID-19 vaccines.
While acknowledging the system's limitations (VAERS is a passive reporting system), her research aims to highlight concerning signals within the data that she believes warrant more detailed investigation by regulatory bodies. This work is highly controversial and often disputed by public health authorities.
4. The Role of the HART Group in Scientific Dissent
As a co-chair of the HART Group (Health Advisory and Recovery Team), Dr. Craig is central to a collective of UK-based doctors, scientists, economists, and lawyers who oppose much of the government's COVID-19 response. The group provides an alternative perspective on data, policy, and the ethical implications of public health measures.
HART’s work, heavily influenced by Dr. Craig’s diagnostic lens, focuses on the importance of informed consent, the dangers of medical coercion, and the need for a balanced assessment of risk, a stance that has put them in direct opposition to bodies like the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
5. Critiquing the 'Miscarriage of Diagnosis'
Drawing on her pathology experience, Dr. Craig has spoken extensively on what she terms a "miscarriage of diagnosis" during the pandemic. This refers to systemic errors in the diagnostic process, from the initial PCR test to the classification of deaths.
She argues that a failure to accurately distinguish between dying *with* COVID-19 and dying *from* COVID-19, combined with the misuse of testing, led to a distorted understanding of the virus's true lethality and demographic impact. This is a core entity in her argument for a full re-evaluation of pandemic statistics.
6. The Cape Byron Lighthouse Declaration and Medical Ethics
Dr. Craig is a signatory to the Cape Byron Lighthouse Declaration, a document calling for a return to ethical medical practices and a rejection of policies that link an individual's participation in society to their medical status (e.g., vaccine passports or mandatory testing).
Her involvement underscores her commitment to the principle of patient autonomy and the rejection of what she views as undue state interference in private medical decisions. This is a crucial area of her work that extends beyond purely scientific data into the realm of medical ethics and civil liberties.
7. Current Work on Substack and Independent Media
In a move reflecting a shift away from traditional media platforms, Dr. Craig uses her Substack publication as a primary channel to disseminate her latest observations and technical analyses directly to the public.
This platform allows her to bypass the editorial filters of mainstream outlets, ensuring her detailed, highly technical arguments—often involving statistical modelling of mortality data, all-cause mortality figures, and public health policy critiques—reach a dedicated audience seeking alternative viewpoints. Her Substack is a key source for her most recent work in 2025.
The Future of Dr. Craig's Influence
Dr. Clare Craig's work continues to be a central pillar for those seeking a critical, evidence-based counter-narrative to official public health responses. Her deep technical knowledge as a pathologist, combined with her courage to challenge powerful institutions, ensures her ongoing relevance in the post-pandemic era.
Whether one agrees with her conclusions or not, her insistence on forensic scrutiny of data, transparency in public health decision-making, and the investigation of unexplained excess deaths means her voice will remain a powerful, and essential, part of the ongoing global conversation about health, science, and freedom. Her analysis stands as a powerful example of scientific dissent demanding accountability from the establishment.
Detail Author:
- Name : Reymundo Medhurst
- Username : don52
- Email : lonie.stehr@bailey.com
- Birthdate : 2002-06-15
- Address : 2359 Blick Oval West Santinaland, ME 51086
- Phone : 1-772-373-2453
- Company : Adams-Miller
- Job : Radiologic Technician
- Bio : Laborum molestiae non quae enim omnis perspiciatis aspernatur. Et quas ab voluptatem tempore et nihil placeat. Maiores magnam dolore recusandae aperiam similique quia voluptate.
Socials
twitter:
- url : https://twitter.com/halvorson1984
- username : halvorson1984
- bio : Qui laborum itaque qui. Saepe illo quis deserunt veniam. Vitae rerum sapiente nemo suscipit ut et.
- followers : 903
- following : 1319
tiktok:
- url : https://tiktok.com/@harold.halvorson
- username : harold.halvorson
- bio : Odit illum qui qui et hic quas rerum.
- followers : 2522
- following : 1220