Alexee Trevizo: A Quick Biography and Case Timeline
Alexee Trevizo was a high school senior and a cheerleader in Artesia, New Mexico, when she became the central figure in a tragic and highly publicized criminal case. Her personal life, academic pursuits, and age became immediate points of discussion as the details of the incident emerged.
- Full Name: Alexee Trevizo
- Age (as of Dec 2025): Approximately 21 years old (Born c. 2004)
- Location: Artesia, New Mexico
- Original Incident Date: January 27, 2023
- Location of Incident: Artesia General Hospital
- Victim: Her newborn baby boy (unnamed in most reports)
- Charges: First-Degree Murder and Tampering with Evidence
- Plea: Not Guilty
- Key Legal Development (2025): New Mexico Supreme Court appeal regarding evidence suppression.
The core timeline of the case began on January 27, 2023, when Trevizo, then 19, went to Artesia General Hospital complaining of back pain. Upon examination, medical staff determined she was in labor. She gave birth in a hospital bathroom, and the newborn was later found deceased in a trash can. An autopsy determined the baby was born alive and died of asphyxiation. She was arrested on May 10, 2023, and subsequently charged with murder. The legal proceedings have been defined by the defense's aggressive strategy to challenge the evidence, culminating in the critical Supreme Court review that has paused the trial indefinitely through 2025.
The Critical 2025 Supreme Court Battle Over Evidence
The single most important development defining the Alexee Trevizo case in 2025 is the appeal to the New Mexico Supreme Court. This legal maneuver has effectively halted the scheduled trial and placed the entire prosecution on hold. The defense team, led by attorney Gary Mitchell, is fighting to suppress the key piece of evidence: the alleged confession Trevizo made to police officers and medical staff while she was still a patient in the hospital bed.
The defense's argument for suppressing this evidence is twofold, based on fundamental legal and medical principles:
1. Violation of Miranda Rights: The defense contends that Trevizo was subjected to a custodial interrogation by police officers without first being read her Miranda rights (the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney). The bodycam footage, which captured her statements, is therefore argued to be inadmissible "fruit of the poisonous tree." The district court initially agreed with the defense to suppress the statements, but the prosecution appealed, pushing the matter to the Supreme Court.
2. Violation of HIPAA and Patient-Physician Privilege: A secondary, yet powerful, argument involves the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and patient-physician privilege. The defense argues that the police presence in her hospital room, and the alleged involvement of medical staff in the questioning, violated her right to medical privacy and privileged communication. The Supreme Court is reviewing the complex interplay between law enforcement actions and a patient's rights in a medical setting, a decision that could set a major precedent in New Mexico law.
A ruling in favor of Trevizo by the New Mexico Supreme Court would mean the exclusion of the bodycam footage and her statements, leaving the prosecution with a significantly weaker case reliant solely on forensic evidence (the autopsy results) and circumstantial evidence. This outcome could potentially lead to the dismissal of the first-degree murder charge or a plea deal for a lesser charge.
The Wrongful Death Lawsuit Against the Hospital
A parallel legal strategy by the defense team involves a wrongful death lawsuit filed against Artesia General Hospital. This move introduces the concept of shared culpability and attempts to shift focus away from Trevizo's sole responsibility. The lawsuit alleges that the hospital staff failed to properly diagnose and treat Trevizo's condition when she first presented with symptoms, and that their subsequent actions contributed to the tragic outcome.
This civil case is a critical component of the overall defense strategy in 2025. By establishing a narrative of negligence on the part of the hospital, the defense aims to create reasonable doubt in the criminal trial. The entities involved in this lawsuit—including the hospital's administration, specific medical personnel, and the defense's expert witnesses—are now under intense scrutiny. The lawsuit's timeline and discovery process are proceeding alongside the criminal appeal, creating a dual-track legal battle.
What’s Next: Implications for the Trial and Trevizo’s Future
As of late 2025, the trial remains in a holding pattern, with no new trial date set following the removal of the August 2024 date from the docket. The next major event in the case will be the ruling from the New Mexico Supreme Court.
- If the Supreme Court Rules for the Prosecution: The bodycam footage and hospital statements will be allowed as evidence. The first-degree murder trial will be promptly rescheduled, and the prosecution will have a strong case based on Trevizo's own alleged admissions.
- If the Supreme Court Rules for the Defense: The key evidence will be suppressed. The prosecution will face a massive hurdle, significantly increasing the likelihood of a reduced charge, a plea bargain, or even a full dismissal of the murder charge due to insufficient evidence. This ruling would also establish a significant legal precedent regarding patient rights in New Mexico.
The case continues to draw national attention, fueled by the disturbing nature of the crime and the complex legal questions surrounding the collection of evidence. The outcome in 2025 will not only determine Alexee Trevizo's fate—potentially a life sentence for murder—but will also clarify the balance between law enforcement's investigative power and a patient's right to privacy and legal counsel while receiving medical care. All eyes remain on the New Mexico Supreme Court for the definitive ruling that will finally move this high-profile case forward.
Detail Author:
- Name : Trey Emmerich V
- Username : caesar.altenwerth
- Email : nfadel@terry.com
- Birthdate : 1978-07-03
- Address : 13088 Moses Cliff Suite 855 South Flossie, OR 85275
- Phone : 1-539-738-1125
- Company : Pfannerstill, Bogan and Mueller
- Job : Photographic Developer
- Bio : Laudantium ad non consectetur. Ipsa nesciunt ut fugit a nisi. Inventore sunt et inventore iusto quisquam. Quas vel numquam eveniet dolor enim est.
Socials
twitter:
- url : https://twitter.com/jeanne8971
- username : jeanne8971
- bio : Modi vel recusandae rerum perferendis. Impedit tempora est maxime a quis voluptate fuga. Optio nobis officia voluptatum explicabo eveniet rerum.
- followers : 3890
- following : 2013
tiktok:
- url : https://tiktok.com/@jeanne.reynolds
- username : jeanne.reynolds
- bio : Quibusdam rerum sunt eveniet omnis eveniet nostrum expedita.
- followers : 3573
- following : 2481
instagram:
- url : https://instagram.com/jeanne.reynolds
- username : jeanne.reynolds
- bio : Deleniti quis soluta ipsa nostrum soluta dolorem. Sunt praesentium consequatur qui nihil suscipit.
- followers : 3078
- following : 862
linkedin:
- url : https://linkedin.com/in/jeanne_reynolds
- username : jeanne_reynolds
- bio : Ducimus quasi quaerat qui inventore nobis.
- followers : 1663
- following : 1422
facebook:
- url : https://facebook.com/jeanne_real
- username : jeanne_real
- bio : Reiciendis atque tempore est voluptate impedit incidunt.
- followers : 2067
- following : 2917